Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Garden

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1963No. Calendar 102, Docket 49,661PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.

Plaintiffs are owners of real estate in defendant city. They brought this suit to have (certain special tax assessments against their propferties for sewers, water mains, and a pumping station, decreed to be void, and enforcement thereof enjoined.

In 1955 the Biltmore Building Company, not a party to this suit, subdivided certain land it owned in defendant city into lots and built houses on them. Some of plaintiffs’ lots are in, and others adjacent to, the Biltmore subdivisions. Biltmore desired construction of the sewers, water mains, and pumping station to make its lots suitable for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Whitney v. Common Council of HudsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Auditor General v. CalkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Butler v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Mills v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Thayer Lumber Co. v. City of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wellman v. WellmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Johnson v. City of InksterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Johnson v. City of InksterMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Johnson v. City of InksterMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Wikman v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API