Legal Opinion
Johnson v. City of Inkster
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided November 25, 1974No. Docket 16884PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, P. J.
On March 5, 1970 the City of Inkster and the Wayne County Road Commission entered into an agreement to share the cost of widening and reconstructing that section of Mid dlebelt Road which runs through Inkster. Middle-belt is a county primary road which extends north and south through Wayne County. Prior to reconstruction, Middlebelt Road within Inkster was two lanes wide, asphalt paved without curbs or gutters. It handled not only local traffic, but also heavy through traffic, due to its proximity to Wayne County Metropolitan Airport. However, a bottleneck existed at Inkster’s north and south…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Aikens v. Department of ConservationMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Fluckey v. City of PlymouthMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Smith v. City CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Osius v. DingellMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Crampton v. City of Royal OakMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Edros Corp. v. City of Port HuronMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Johnson v. City of InksterMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Rogoski v. City of MuskegonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Christoff v. City of GladstoneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Johnson v. City of InksterMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.