Legal Opinion

Rustic Hills Shopping Plaza, Inc. v. Columbia Savings & Loan Ass'n

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 28, 1983No. 82SC18PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROVIRA, Justice.

Petitioners appeal a district court denial of a preliminary injunction to bar the foreclosure sale of certain property. We affirm.

I

On April 5, 1968, Smartt Construction Company, B.H. Smartt, and M.A. Smartt (Smartt) executed a deed of trust in favor of Columbia Savings and Loan Association (Columbia) encumbering the Rustic Hills Shopping Center in Colorado Springs. The deed of trust secured payment of a promissory note for $1,800,000 payable in monthly installments and contained a “due-on-sale” clause, which provided that “[i]n the event of the sale or transfer of the real…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mutual Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Wisconsin Wire WorksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Barday v. SteinbaughSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  3. Carpenter v. WinnColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Motlong v. World Savings and Loan AssociationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  5. Income Realty & Mortgage, Inc. v. Columbia Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Central National Bank of Greencastle v. ShoupIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Capitol Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Glenwood Manor, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. Income Realty & Mortgage, Inc. v. Columbia Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  4. Lucero v. UlvestadColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Bishop & Co. v. CuomoColorado Court of Appeals · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API