Legal Opinion
Bishop & Co. v. Cuomo
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided August 30, 1990No. 89CA1714PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge DAVIDSON.
Plaintiff, Bishop & Co., appeals the trial court’s denial of its motion for a preliminary injunction to restrain defendants from using an alleged trade secret belonging to Bishop. We affirm.
Defendants, Bartholomew A. Cuomo (Cuomo) and Andrew Cuomo, are licensed real estate brokers who were officers and shareholders of Bishop & Co., a real estate sales, rental, and management company. The Cuomos’ contract with Bishop did not contain a covenant not to compete. After a period of time, defendants left Bishop and started their own real estate business.
The primary dispute…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bell & Howell: Mamiya Co. v. Masel Supply Co. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Boeing Company v. Sierracin CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- SI Handling Systems, Inc. v. HeisleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Ross v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Fmc Corporation v. Taiwan Tainan Giant Industrial Co., Ltd., and Frederick G. FierchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gold Messenger, Inc. v. McGuayColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- In re the Interest of BlackColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
- Estate of Binford v. GibsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1992