Legal Opinion
In Re Claims Against the Kern Grain Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 18, 1985No. C2-84-2146PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
This contested case proceeding was to determine which (if any) of the 41 claims against warehouseman’s bonds issued to Kern Grain Company by Auto-Owners In surance Company should be allowed. After a hearing, the administrative law judge recommended allowance of all claims, and recommended that recovery be allowed against the 1979-80 storage bond, the 1980-81 storage bond, the 1981-82 storage bond, and the 1981-82 sale bond. The Commissioner of Agriculture accepted the administrative law judge’s recommendations, and Auto-Owners sought review. We affirm.
FACTS
Kern Grain…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Humphrey v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Markwardt v. State, Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Crookston Cattle Co. v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Minnesota Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- In Re the Proposed Activation of the Minnesota Joint Underwriting Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- In Re the Claims Against the Grain Buyer's Bond No. 877706-08624237Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- In Re the Claims Against the Grain Buyer's Bond No. 877706-08624237Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992