Legal Opinion · Dissent

Parlor City Lumber Co. v. Sandel

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 1, 1937No. 34090Published

1DissentO’Niell, Chief Justice

■I favor the granting of a rehearing in this case because it appears to me that, in the opinion that was rendered on the original hearing, we did not observe the distinction between fhe discharging of a debt represented by a negotiable instrument and the renouncing of a claim represented by a negotiable instrument. It is said in the original opinion rendered in this case:

“It is contended by plaintiff that the discharge of a negotiable instrument must be in writing unless the instrument is delivered up to the person primarily liable thereon.”

The plaintiff in this case does not contend that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. DalyWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Tisdel v. Central Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  3. Manly v. . BeamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Portland Iron Works v. SiemensOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  5. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co. v. BridgerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API