J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co. v. Bridger
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Action by the J. I. Case Threshing Machine Company against C. C. Bridger. The demands of the plaintiff company were rejected, and it applies for writs of certiorari and prohibition.
1Opinion of the CourtMonroe, J.
Plaintiff brought suit on three past-due promissory notes, amounting in the aggregate to $583; bearing interest at 8 per cent, per annum from August 1, 1909; signed by N. M. Davis and the defendant, C. C. Bridger, as makers; reading, “I promise to pay,” etc.; containing stipulations as to interest and attorney’s fees, and recitations to the effect that they were given for the purchase price'of certain machinery of plaintiff’s manufacture, “this day delivered to me,” the vendor’s privilege upon which is recognized; and to the further effect that the parties “waive presentment for payment,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Orr v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
- Irwin v. ScribnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1860
- Drew v. Bank of MonroeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- Rudison v. GloverSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hidalgo v. DupuyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
- Isaacs v. Van HooseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- Parlor City Lumber Co. v. SandelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
- North Pacific Mortgage Co. v. KrewsonWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Burch v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.