Legal Opinion

Ravenscraft v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 8, 1988No. 3-87-100-CR, 3-87-101-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

In both causes, the district court found appellant guilty of delivery of less than 28 grams of methamphetamine, a controlled substance, and assessed punishment at imprisonment for fifteen years. Tex.Rev.Civ. Stat.Ann. art. 4476-15, § 4.03 (Supp.1988). The sole issue on appeal is whether the district court erred by overruling appellant’s motions to dismiss the indictments for failure to comply with the terms of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD). Tex.Code Cr.P.Ann. art. 51.14 (1979). 1

The instant indictments were returned on January 2, 1986. Shortly thereafter, Llano County placed a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. State v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Akbar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1983
  4. Ex Parte Saylor, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
  5. Huffines v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. David Andrew Birdwell v. Jack Skeen, Jr., Criminal District Attorney of Smith County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  2. Ex Parte SanchezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Engle v. CokerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Kirvin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2011
  5. Birdwell v. SkeenDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API