Huffines v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
CARVER, Justice.
Richard Samuel Huffines appeals from his conviction and punishment for possession of a firearm silencer proscribed by Art. 46.06(a)(4), Tex.Penal Code Ann. (Vernon 1973). We find that Huffines was not subjected to double jeopardy; that Huffines’ punishment was authorized by law; that Huffines was not entitled to dismissal under Art. 51.14, Tex.Code Crim.Pro.Ann. (Vernon 1975); and that Art. 46.06, Tex.Penal Code Ann. (Vernon 1973) is constitutional as enacted and as applied. We affirm.
The record reflects that Huffines’ conviction was entered upon a judicial confession of guilt…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lechuga v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- United States v. Benton F. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
3Cited by11 opinions
- Schin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
- Engle v. CokerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Ex Parte Saylor, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
- Kirvin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Ravenscraft v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.