Legal Opinion

State v. Parrish

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 2005No. 04-216PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morris

¶1 George William Parrish (Parrish) appeals from the denial of his motion for a new trial by the Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County. W e affirm except for the limited issue of whether the District Court improperly ordered Parrish to pay expert witness fees and expenses beyond the $10 per diem set out in §25-10-501, MCA. The State concedes this point and we therefore remand solely for reassessing witness costs.

¶2 We must determine whether the District Court erred by denying Parrish’s motion for a new trial based upon the State’s alleged exercise of peremptory challenges during…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TBSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. State v. VeisMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. FordMontana Supreme Court · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. BarnabyMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State of Louisiana v. Lamondre TuckerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2015
  3. State v. CaseMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. AllumMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. ValdezUtah Supreme Court · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API