Legal Opinion

State v. Allum

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 2005No. 04-188PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶1 Robert Alum appeals from the District Court’s denial of his appeal challenging the judgment and sentence of the Municipal Court. We affirm.

¶2 We address the following issues on appeal:

¶3 1. Whether the Municipal Court violated Alum’s right to trial by jury through its method of jury selection.

¶4 2. Whether the Municipal Court’s jury instructions regarding the elements of criminal trespass correctly stated the law.

¶5 3. Whether the Municipal Court should have given the jury an entrapment instruction.

¶6 4. Whether the store manager had authority to ask Alum to leave the premises.

¶7 5.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. State v. WeaverMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. MartelMontana Supreme Court · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. EnglishMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. LaFreniereMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. DuganMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Montana Supreme Court Commission on the Unauthorized Practice of Law v. O'NeilMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. DittonMontana Supreme Court · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API