Mayfield v. Director of Revenue
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES K. PREWITT, Presiding Judge.
Director appeals the reinstatement of Respondent’s driving privileges following a finding by the trial court that “Director failed to provide explicit proof that the requirements of § 577.041 [RSMo 2000] were met.”
The judgment of the trial court is presumed to be correct and must be affirmed under any reasonable theory supported by the evidence unless there is no substantial evidence to support it, it is against the weight of the evidence, or it erroneously declares or applies the law. Kidd v. Wilson, 50 S.W.3d 858, 860, 862 (Mo.App.2001). A trial court may…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McMaster v. LohmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Bennett v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Brown v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Jarrell v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Wampler v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Allison v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Foster v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- JACOB DANIEL SIMON v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. YarbroughMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Howe v. Dir. RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.