Legal Opinion
Hovanesian v. Nam
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided September 1, 1995No. Docket 144926PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarilyn Kelly, P.J.
In this landlord-tenant dispute, plaintiff, Charles Hovanesian, appeals by leave granted from a decision of the Washtenaw Circuit Court. That court affirmed a district court’s grant of summary disposition and award of attorney fees to defendant, Sang Y. Nam.
On appeal to the Court of Appeals, plaintiff raises several issues. He alleges error in the finding that defendant landlord was not required to give plaintiff written notice of his reasons for retaining plaintiffs security deposit under the Landlord-Tenant Relationships Act, MCL 554.601 et seq.; MSA 26.1138(1) et seq. He asserts that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lorencz v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Borman v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Century Dodge, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Oak Park Village v. GortonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Lesatz v. Standard Green MeadowsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Marshall Lasser, PC v. GeorgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- Lawsuit Financial, LLC v. CurryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Lawsuit Financial, LLC v. CurryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Willis v. New World Van Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
- Pollard v. J.P. Morgan Chase BankDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.