Legal Opinion

Meade v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 24, 1953No. Appeals, 168 and 169PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,

Two actions in trespass were brought against the Pennsylvania Railroad Company by Delbert H. Meade and the Great Lakes Forwarding Corporation to recover damages for personal injuries and property damage resulting from a grade crossing collision. The cases were consolidated for trial and the jury returned verdicts in favor of the plaintiffs. The court granted the defendant’s motions for judgment non obstante veredicto in each case. Plaintiffs appealed.

The appellants’ claims are based on alleged insufficient and untimely warning of the train’s approach to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Serfas v. Lehigh & New England RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Anstine v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Childs v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  4. Bickel v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  5. Callahan v. a. Wishart & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Krentz v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Kowtko v. Delaware and Hudson Railroad Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Hucaluk v. Clyde Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Hollock v. Occupational Disease Fund, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1974
  5. Jursic v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API