Legal Opinion

Hucaluk v. Clyde Realty Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 28, 1954No. Appeals, Nos. 3 and 4PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,

*171These are wrongful death and survival actions in trespass instituted by Helen Hucaluk, individually and as administratrix, against Clyde Realty Company, Inc. and Standard Accident Insurance Company of Detroit to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s husband, Walter Hucaluk, Sr. Defendants, while not decedent’s employers, are the owners of the building, in which decedent worked, and an indemnity company, the latter being made a party under the Act of May 2, 1929, P. L. 1518, sec. 4, as amended, 35 PS 1345; Bollin v. Elevator Construction & Repair…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kasanovich v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Bollin v. Elevator Construction & Repair Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Ferry v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  4. Strobel v. ParkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Zawacki v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Michener AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Erney v. Wunsch, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, York County1983
  3. Karcesky v. LariaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Karcesky v. LariaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Scott v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API