Legal Opinion

Wolf v. Keagy

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided February 2, 1927No. 100PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harrington, J.,

delivering the opinion of the court:

Two questions are presented by the demurrer:

1. Whether the allegation “unlawful and contrary to traffic regulations” in the fourth and eighth counts are sufficiently specific.

2. Whether the husband, under the Married Women’s Statute, now in force in this state, is a proper party in an action against the wife for a voluntary tort committed by her, though in his presence.

The first question is governed by Thomas v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co., 1 Penn. 593, 42 A. 987.

Under the rule announced in that case, where a foreign statute is relied on, it must be…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Martin v. RobsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Quilty v. . BattieNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Kowing v. . ManlyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Plotkin v. PlotkinSuperior Court of Delaware · 1924
  5. Rowe v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1871

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Albuquerque Hilton Inn v. HaleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Mackenzie Oil Co. v. Omar Oil & Gas Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1929
  3. Royal Insurance Co. v. SimonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1934
  4. Holland v. Universal Life Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1935
  5. Hyland v. SouthwellSuperior Court of Delaware · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API