Legal Opinion

Holland v. Universal Life Co.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided July 3, 1935No. 60PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Layton, C. J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

It is admitted that the jurisdiction of the foreign court is impeachable, Pritchett v. Clark, 3 Harr. 517; Thompson v. Whitman, 18 Wall. 457, 21 L. Ed. 897; but it is urged that the record is full and complete as to jurisdiction and that a presumption of regularity obtains. So, it is argued, the affidavit of defense must deny explicitly and circumstantially the jurisdiction by setting forth facts which, if proved, would overcome the presumption; and failing this, the affidavit of defense is insufficient.

The motion for judgment must be refused.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Thompson v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Old Wayne Mut. Life Assn. of Indianapolis v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Douglass v. Phenix InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Tucker v. Columbian National Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  5. Wolf v. KeagySuperior Court of Delaware · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Riley v. New York Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Stentor Electric Mfg. Co. v. Klaxon Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  3. Williams v. Steamship Mutual Underwriting Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. McElroy v. McElroyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1969
  5. Waltemeyer v. StognerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API