Legal Opinion

United States v. Gambino

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 22, 1990No. 7 "S" 88 Cr. 919 (PKL)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER & OPINION

LEISURE, District Judge:

Defendant Emanuele Adamita (“Adami-ta”) has been indicted for conspiracy to import narcotics into the United States in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 963, for conspiracy to distribute or to possess with intent to distribute narcotics in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and for participation in a racketeering conspiracy in violation of the RICO statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d). Adamita has filed a motion to dismiss the indictment against him pursuant to the double jeopardy clause of the fifth amendment to the U.S. Constitution. More specifically, Ada-mita argues that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. KipiHawaii Supreme Court · 1991
  2. United States v. D'AmicoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  3. United States v. GambinoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  4. United States v. CrosbyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
  5. United States v. GambinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API