Legal Opinion
United States v. Crosby
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 16, 1992No. Crim. 91-0559-08 (GHR)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
REVERCOMB, District Judge.
On December 16,1991, defendant Ronald Bruce Crosby filed a motion with this Court, styled an Omnibus Motion to Dismiss Counts One, Two and Three of the Indictment and Racketeering Acts 1, 2, 25 and 26 (the “Omnibus Motion”), seeking an order dismissing the counts in which he is alleged to have violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq., and to have engaged in a conspiracy to violate the narcotics laws of the United States in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. As grounds for dismissal, Mr. Crosby asserted that…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- United States v. TajideenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Ronald Bruce Crosby, A/K/A Bruce R. Crosby, United States of America v. Jeffrey W. Williams, United States of America v. Bernard WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- United States v. TajideenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018