Legal Opinion

Kalmakoff v. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1985No. 7767PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINO WITZ, Justice.

Nine years ago, Artemie Kalmakoff applied for a limited entry permit for the Chignik purse seine salmon fishery. The Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission denied his request and the superior court affirmed this denial. On appeal, he attacks the Commission’s factual findings and parts of the point system that is used to determine who receives permits. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

After it received Kalmakoff’s application, the Commission’s staff eventually decided that he should be awarded seventeen points. 1 He had fished as…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Braniff Airways, Incorporated v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Eastern Air Lines, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  2. Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Isakson v. RickeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. ApokedakAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. OstroskyAlaska Supreme Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Johns v. Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Nelson v. Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  3. Lakosh v. ALASKA DEPT. OF ENVIRON. CONSERV.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Carlson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. AndersonAlaska Supreme Court · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API