Legal Opinion
Chicago Great Western Ry. Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 5, 1952No. 14445_1PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from an interlocutory-order granting a preliminary injunction in an equitable action brought by the seven railroad companies named as appellees against Chicago Great Western Railway Company, named as appellant herein. We shall refer to the parties as they were designated in the trial court. The action was for an injunction (1) requiring defendant to perform switching service between South St. Paul, Minnesota, on the west side of the Mississippi River, and a yard of defendant known as Hoffman Avenue Yard in St. Paul, Minnesota, on the east side of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Sterling v. ConstantinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- California Water Service Co. v. City of ReddingSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Mayo v. Lakeland Highlands Canning Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Railroad Commission v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Doeskin Products, Inc. v. United Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- Berrigan v. SiglerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Thompson v. BarnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Virginia Richmond v. Albert Weiner, as of the Estate of Harry SoforenkoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Tampa Phosphate Railroad Company v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.