Legal Opinion

Kozich v. Kozich

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1990No. 00077PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMILIA, Judge.

This appeal presents the issue whether the disability portion of a tort settlement remains separate property of the injured spouse for purposes of equitable distribution. The trial court, by Order dated November 22, 1989, adopted the recommendations of the master, which, inter alia, determined that the settlement proceeds were marital property, and ordered appellant/husband David T. Kozich to pay to appellee/wife $320,000. We affirm.

The parties were married on October 16, 1976 and had two minor children who now reside with the wife. On March 20, 1982, while in the course of his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Platek v. PlatekSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. MacFarland v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Gee v. GeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Dixon's CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Dorrance's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crocker v. CrockerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. Drake v. DrakeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Budnick v. BudnickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Crocker v. CrockerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  5. Drake v. DrakeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API