Legal Opinion

Harleysville Mutual Insurance v. Catastrophic Loss Trust Fund

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1986No. 2660 C.D. 1985 and No. 2659 C.D. 1985PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion ry

Judge Barry,

Before us are preliminary objections filed by respondents, the Catastrophic Loss Trust Fund (CAT Fund), opposing the petitions for review filed in this courts *217original jurisdiction by petitioners, the EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN of Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company (BENEFIT PLAN) and Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company (HMIC), filing as a separate entity. The petitions seek a declaratory order that the CAT Fund is obligated to provide benefits to Mrs. Marion Lyons, an employee of HMIC and a member of its BENEFIT PLAN1 and to Mr. DeForrest Van Laufer, a no-fault…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shenango Valley Osteopathic Hospital v. Department of Health of CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Canonsburg General Hospital v. Department of HealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Lashe v. Northern York County School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. DeLuca v. Buckeye Coal CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. St. Joe Minerals Corp. v. GoddardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Manor v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Ruszin v. Commonwealth, Department of Labor & Industry, Bureau of Workers' CompensationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Pennsylvania Ass'n of Rehabilitation Facilities v. FosterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Employee Benefit Plan of Harleysville Mutual Insurance v. GrodeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Pennsylvania Assigned Risk Plan v. GrodeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API