Legal Opinion

Employee Benefit Plan of Harleysville Mutual Insurance v. Grode

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 12, 1988No. Appeal, No. 2986 C. D. 1986PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Barry,

In Harleysville Mutual Insurance Co. v. Catastrophic Loss Trust Fund, 101 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 215, 515 A.2d 1039 (1986), we sustained preliminary objections filed by the Catastrophic Loss Trust Fund (CAT Fund) and dismissed two petitions for review filed in our original jurisdiction by Harleysville Mutual Insurance Co. (Harleysville) and the Employee Benefit Plan of Harleysville Mutual Insurance Co. (Benefit Plan). In essence, both Harleysville and the Benefit Plan were challenging the CAT Funds denial of benefits to two in*472dividuals who had been seriously injured in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Heffner v. Allstate InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Harleysville Mutual Insurance v. Catastrophic Loss Trust FundCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. FosterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Bergey v. FosterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Ochs v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. EMP. BP, HRLYSVLE. MUT. INS. CO. v. GrodeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API