Legal Opinion

Ethan Allen, Inc. v. Maine Central Railroad

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided May 4, 1977No. Civ. A. 75-65PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COFFRIN, District Judge.

On July 3, 1973 the Maine Central Railroad Company (“Maine Central”), a carrier subject to the Interstate Commerce Act (“Act”), 49 U.S.C. § 1, et seq., published an embargo notice ceasing all rail service on its 22.96 mile dead-end line from North Stratford, New Hampshire, to Beecher Falls, Vermont, because of tract structure damage from heavy rains and flooding. The principal victim of this cessation of operations was Maine Central’s sole customer on that line, Ethan Allen, Inc., a furniture manufacturer with a plant in Beecher Falls, Vermont, which was specifically…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Puritan Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Hardwick Farmers Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. DettlebachSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chevy Chase Land Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Decatur County Commissioners v. Surface Transportation BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  3. General Foods Corp. v. BakerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1978
  4. Railroad Ventures, Inc. v. Surface Transportation BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  5. Gs Roofing Products Company v. Surface Transportation BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API