Legal Opinion

Pitman v. Pitman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 18, 1959No. 37680PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Carlisle, Judge.

1. The two motions to dismiss the writ of error are not meritorious and are denied.

2. The name “Pitman Manufacturing Company of Georgia” imports a corporation, nothing to the contrary appearing, and a promissory note which is signed “Pitman Mfg. Co. of Georgia, Alfred T. Pitman, Pres., Herbert E. Williams, Treas.” is prima facie an obligation of Pitman Manufacturing Company of Georgia, and not the individual obligation of Alfred T. Pitman or Herbert E. Williams. Harris v. Ackerman, 88 Ga. App. 128 (2) (76 S. E. 2d 132), and cits.; cf. Katz v. Teicher, 98 Ga. App. 842 (107 S.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. SharpeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  2. Ridley v. HightowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Martin v. GurleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  4. Harris v. AckermanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  5. Bower v. ThomasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pitman v. PitmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API