Legal Opinion

M & M Auto Outlet v. Hill Investment Corp.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 2010No. S-09-0160PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Justice.

[¶ 1] M & M Auto Outlet (M & M) and Hill Investment Corporation, doing business as First Financial, Inc., (FFI) entered into a contract in which FFI agreed to purchase vehicle loans from M & M and perform collection activities on the loans at its expense. In the event an M & M customer became delinquent on a loan, the contract provided that M & M would pay FFI the “full recourse amount.” Alleging that M & M failed to pay the full recourse amount on delinquent loans in accordance with the contract, FFI filed a complaint for breach of contract. The district court granted summary…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Scherer Construction, LLC v. Hedquist Construction, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Cathcart v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Examination Management Services, Inc. v. KirschbaumWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Hickman v. GrovesWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Ecosystem Resources, L.C. v. Broadbent Land & Resources, L.L.C.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Claman v. PoppWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Davidson Land Co., LLC v. DavidsonWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  3. White v. Shane Edeburn Construction, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Ultra Resources, Inc., a Wyoming CorporationWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Union Pacific R. Co. v. Caballo Coal Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API