Legal Opinion
Hickman v. Groves
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided June 17, 2003No. 02-173PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEHMAN, Justice.
[¶ 1] This is an appeal from summary judgment entered in favor of appellees Bernice Groves, James E. Drake, and Edra June Drake (collectively appellees) and against appellants John W. Hickman, Fred J. Boyce, and Lane Boyce (collectively appellants). In granting summary judgment, the district court ruled that appellants’ predecessors had not reserved any rights to gas, whether from oil or coalbed methane gas (CBM), when they transferred certain real property located in Campbell County to appellees’ predecessors. Upon our review, we reverse and remand.
ISSUES
[¶ 2] Appellants…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Boehm v. Cody Country Chamber of CommerceWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- KN Energy, Inc. v. Great Western Sugar Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Weaver v. Blue Cross-Blue ShieldWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Amoco Production Co. v. EM Nominee Partnership Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Moncrief v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Galardi v. Naples Polaris, L.L.C.Nevada Supreme Court · 2013
- MULLINNIX LLC v. HKB Royalty TrustWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Jason Thornock v. Pacificorp, an Oregon CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
- Jacobs Ranch Coal Co. v. Thunder Basin Coal Co., LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Caballo Coal Company v. Fidelity Exploration & Production CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.