Legal Opinion

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Estes

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 30, 1967PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpiegel, J.

This bill in equity by an issuer of certain surety bonds, as to which the defendant Estes is an indemnitor, seeks to reach and apply in satisfaction of any present or future liability of Estes to the plaintiff certain shares of stock owned by Estes but in the possession of the defendant American Employers Insurance Company (American). The only service on Estes, a resident of Dallas, Texas, was substituted service of notice pursuant to Rule 14 of the Superior Court (1954).

American filed a motion “that the Court decline to take jurisdiction of this ease for the reason that complete jus tice…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Universal Adjustment Corp. v. Midland Bank, Ltd., of LondonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Ginn v. AlmyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  4. Bethlehem Fabricators, Inc. v. H. D. Watts Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Lydia E. Pinkham Medicine Co. v. GoveMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. W.R. Grace & Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  2. Carlson Corp. v. University of VermontMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. Kearsarge Metallurgical Corp. v. Peerless InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  4. Oxford Global Res., LLC v. HernandezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  5. Minnis v. PeeblesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API