Caldwell v. Yeatman
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the Court
As early as 1827 Chief Justice Richardson speaking for this court announced it was well settled as a rule of policy in this state that "jurors are not to be received to testify to the motives and inducements on which they may have joined in a verdict . . . . Nor can the affidavits of all the jurors be received to correct a mistake in the verdict." Tyler v. Stevens, 4 N.H. 116, 117. Six years later in the case of State v. Hascall, 6 N.H. 352, 361, an exception (see Hearn v. Railroad,67 N.H. 320, 323), to this general rule was formulated which permitted the use of affidavits of jurors to…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- H. P. Welch Co. v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938
- Clark v. ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1887
- Leighton v. SargentSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1855
- Mason v. KnoxSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1891
- Dearborn v. NewhallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1885
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Drop Anchor Realty Trust Charlotte Marshall v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Winslow v. Town of Holderness Planning BoardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- State v. KennaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Bothwick v. LaBelleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- Brigham v. Hudson Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.