Legal Opinion

Peer v. Wadsworth

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 14, 1904PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Heard on bill, supplemental bill, answer, replication and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

Emery, V. C.

The complainants, as owners of the fee and lessors, file this bill against Wadsworth, their lessee, and the G-oerlre Company, a sublessee of part of the leased premises, to enjoin the violation of a covenant in the lease, relating to cutting through the walls of the building on the premises and to compel the restoration of the walls to their original condition when leased. The premises leased to Wadsworth comprised a four-story building, No. 157 ifarket street, in the city of Newark, and a building adjoining it' in the rear in the shape of an “L,” fronting on another street, this…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Baranov v. ScudderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. S.P. Dunham Co. v. 26 E. State St. Realty Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  4. Doyle v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Rossi v. SierchioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API