Legal Opinion

Russell v. Ware

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 5, 1964No. 22647PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

1. It is never error to allow evidence to be introduced over objections that it is irrelevant and prejudicial, where as here, the evidence was in proof of allegations of the pleadings which had not been demurred to. Beasley v. Burt, 201 Ga. 144 (39 SE2d 51), Adler v. Adler, *388207 Ga. 394 (61 SE2d 824), and cases cited in these cases. Nor was it error to charge the jury to consider such evidence and that they would be authorized to make a finding based thereon. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Fowler, 77 Ga. App. 206 (47 SE2d 874); Martin v. Nichols, 127 Ga. 705 (56 SE…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Evans v. MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Adler v. AdlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  3. Martin v. NicholsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  4. Fleming v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. Beasley v. BurtSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Adler v. OrmondCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  2. Unified Government of Athens-Clarke County v. Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API