Goetze v. Hanks
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDevine, P. J.
Plaintiffs, appellants, filed this action for unlawful detainer. The three-day notice required by statute declares noncompliance by defendant to have been failure to pay the sum of $13,500 which was due to appellants on or before November 15, 1966, and failure to pay certain taxes and assessments which defendant was obliged to pay under his agreement with plaintiffs. General demurrer was sustained on the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The court’s comment in the order sustaining the demurrer is that defendant, as a buyer in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Seidell v. Anglo-California Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Fisher v. General Petroleum Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Francis v. West Virginia Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Baugh v. Consumers Associates, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Woods-Drury, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
3Cited by7 opinions
- Greene v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Taylor v. Nu Digital Marketing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Hudec v. RobertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Jenson v. Kenneth I. Mullen, Consulting Engineers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- Beverly Hills Estate, LLC v. Warner CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.