Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Nu Digital Marketing, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 29, 2016No. C074883PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOCH, J.

— In this unlawful detainer action, judgment was entered in favor of plaintiffs, Jon and Kimberly Taylor, owners of real property located in Auburn, and against defendant Nu Digital Marketing, Inc., that acquired possession of the property through an agreement titled, “Contract of Sale Residential Property,” but that the trial court found to be a lease notwithstanding the title. Defendant appeals, contending plaintiffs’ complaint did not state a cause of action for unlawful detainer because the agreement was a contract of sale, and a defaulting buyer in possession of property…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Kim v. Westmoore Partners, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Allen v. TotenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Coles v. GlaserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. ITV Gurney Holding Inc. v. Gurney, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. 65282 Two Bunch Palms Building LLC v. Coastal Harvest II, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  4. Barajas v. Triola CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Borden v. StilesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API