Legal Opinion

City of Jacksonville v. Drew

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1882PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Duval county. The declaration of the Defendant in Error in this case alleges that the defendant, the City of Jacksonville, before and on the 31st day of March, A. D. 1881, was possessed of and had control of a public bridge over Hogans’ Creek, on a certain public street called Washington Street, in the said city, in the county aforesaid, and ought to have kept the same in good and safe repair and condition ; yet the defendant, not.…

Read the full summary

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Duval county. The declaration of the Defendant in Error in this case alleges that the defendant, the City of Jacksonville, before and on the 31st day of March, A. D. 1881, was possessed of and had control of a public bridge over Hogans’ Creek, on a certain public street called Washington Street, in the said city, in the county aforesaid, and ought to have kept the same in good and safe repair and condition ; yet the defendant, not. regarding its duty in that behalf while it was so possessed and had control of the said bridge, to-wit: on the day…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice VanValkenburgh

In May, 1881, Columbus Drew, Jr., brought his action against the City of Jacksonville for damages incurred by him by reason of a defective bridge over Hogans’ Creek in the said city, which defendant was bound to keep iu. repair, claiming damages in the sum of five hundred dollars. Defendant pleaded not guilty, and the plaintiff duly replied. Subsequently and in November, A. D. 1881, the defendant, by leave of the court, filed another plea alleging that the said Hogans’ Creek Bridge was being repaired under an independent contract with the Trustees of the Sanitary Improvement Bonds of the said…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barnes v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Mayor of New-York v. BaileyNew York Supreme Court · 1845
  3. Storrs v. . the City of UticaNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  4. Conrad v. . the Trustees of the Village of IthacaNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  5. City of Logansport v. DickIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Village of Jefferson v. ChapmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Ballard v. City of TampaSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  3. Day v. City of St. AugustineSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. Park v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Kristiansen v. City of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API