Office of Lawyer Regulation v. DeMaio
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Per curiam
¶ 1. We review a report and recommendation by Referee James G. Curtis that Attorney Daniel E DeMaio be publicly reprimanded for his professional misconduct and that he be ordered to pay the full costs of this disciplinary proceeding.
¶ 2. Following the filing of the referee's report and recommendation, Attorney DeMaio filed a document entitled "Respondent's Dispositional Memo," which purported to address the question of the appropriate sanction. After the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) filed a motion to strike this filing because it was not a notice of appeal, Attorney DeMaio withdrew the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against InglimoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against CarrollWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against RieglemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Disciplinary Proceedings Against KruegerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In RE DIS. PROCEEDINGS AGAINST DeMAIOWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009