Legal Opinion

Coughran v. First National Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 8, 1937No. Civ. No. S. C. 36PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DESMOND, J., pro tem.

In this case the receiver of the First National Bank of Baldwin Park appeals from a judgment entered in an action which plaintiffs brought to quiet title to certain real estate in Long Beach. The grounds of appeal are that the judgment is not supported by the evidence, and further, that it is based upon vitally conflicting findings, and therefore cannot stand. Said receiver also appeals from the order denying motion for new trial.

The receiver’s predecessor in office, one F. W. Heathcote had secured two judgments against one Charles W. Coughran, had recorded abstracts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seymour v. McAvoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Gray v. CottonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. McColgan v. Magee, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Anderson v. AdlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Canfield v. Security First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ambrose v. First National Bank of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Ambrose v. First National Bank of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API