Legal Opinion

Lloyd v. Scott

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 27, 1830PublishedCited by 90 opinions

THIS was an action of replevin°brought by the plaintiff to replevy certain goods and chattels which the defendant, as bailiff of William S. Moore, had taken upon a distress for rent claimed by the said Moore to be due upon certain houses and lots in Alexandria, owned and held by the plaintiff. The sum for which distress was made is five hundred dollars. The declaration is in the usual form; and the damages claimed one thousand dollars..

Read the full summary

THIS was an action of replevin°brought by the plaintiff to replevy certain goods and chattels which the defendant, as bailiff of William S. Moore, had taken upon a distress for rent claimed by the said Moore to be due upon certain houses and lots in Alexandria, owned and held by the plaintiff. The sum for which distress was made is five hundred dollars. The declaration is in the usual form; and the damages claimed one thousand dollars.. The defendant filed his cognizance, in which he acknowledges the taking of the goods, &c. in the declaration mentioned, and states that a, certain Jonathan…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice M’Lean

delivered thp opinion of the Court.

This is an action of replevin, brought to replevy certain goods and chattels which the defendant, as bailiff of WiHiam. S. Moore, had taken upon a distress for rent claimed to be due upon certain houses and lots in Alexandria, owned and possessed by the plaintiff- The sum for which the distress was made is five hundred dollars.

The declaration is in the Usual form, and the damages are laid at one thousand dollars. The defendant filed his cognizance, in which he acknowledges the taking of the goods specified in the declaration; and states that a certain…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. De Wolf v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1825

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Ewell v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Smiley v. CitibankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Trust Co. v. KrumseigSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Cram v. HendricksCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1831

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API