Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Greensboro-Fayetteville Bus Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 1930PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, O. J.,

after stating the case: The order striking the defendants’ purported statement of case on appeal from the file of the papers in the cause is supported by the decision in Hicks v. Westbrook, 121 N. C., 131, 28 S. E., 188. This, however, did not entitle the plaintiff to a dismissal of the appeal. Wallace v. Salisbury, 147 N. C., 58, 60 S. E., 713. Non constat, an examination of the defendants’ purported statement of case on appeal, filed here with application for certiorari, fails to convince us that, on the defendants’ own showing, reversible error was committed on the trial of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wallace v. . SalisburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. McNeill v. Raleigh & Augusta Air Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. Hicks v. . WestbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pruitt v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Pruitt v. . WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. State v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. American Floor MacHine Co. v. DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API