United States v. Sundeep Dharni
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Appellant Sundeep Dharni’s petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED. The previous opinion, United States v. Dharni, 738 F.3d 1186 (9th Cir.2014), is VACATED. The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED AS MOOT.
I
Our resolution of this case was premised on the conclusion that “the district court judge specifically authorized family members and spectators to reenter when seats were available.” Dharni, 738 F.3d at 1189. It was on that understanding that we held that “the insufficient seating for spectators and family members for a limited period of time of uncertain duration did not violate…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Presley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mohamed Sabra v. Maricopa County Community CollCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Guillory v. SantoroDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
- United States v. Angel FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Sundeep DharniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Sundeep DharniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.