Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Sundeep Dharni

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 6, 2015No. 11-16438Unpublished

1DissentWallace, J.

I dissent from this. Order for the same reasons I dissented from the majority’s order requiring to the parties to show cause. As I explained there, we should now reinstate our prior opinion, United States v. Dharni, 738 F.3d 1186, reh’g granted and opinion vacated, 757 F.3d 1002 (9th Cir.2014), because Dharni has stipulated that he cannot establish that the facts assumed in our original opinion were wrong. That stipulation forecloses him from carrying his burden of establishing a Sixth Amendment violation. Because he has failed to carry his burden, the district court did not err in denying…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Sundeep DharniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. Sundeep DharniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API