Legal Opinion

City of Winfield v. Peeden

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 12, 1899No. 582PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Cowley district court; J. A. Burnette, ' judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*672The opinion of the court was delivered by

Milton, J.:

In June, 1894, defendant in error was performing labor for the city of Winfield in lieu of his poll-tax. The first day he worked on the streets, and on the morning of the second day, at the request of the street commissioner, he went to a gravel-bank belonging to the city and which had been in use for two seasons, to assist in loading wagons with material to be used on the streets. The petition alleged that the gravel-bank was an extremely dangerous place, and known to be such by the. city officials and the street commissioner, and that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re AshbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
  2. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. SackettCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1897

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Town of Germantown v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Hendershot v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Luebken v. City of HanoverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API