State v. Odom
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kittredge
Anthony Clark Odom (Appellant) appeals his conviction for criminal solicitation of a minor. We affirm.
I
Appellant’s conviction for criminal solicitation of a minor1 followed a series of internet chat sessions with an undercover Westminster, South Carolina, city police officer2 posing as a fourteen-year-old girl. The internet exchanges occurred from May 4-6, 2006, in Oconee County, South Carolina. A jury found Appellant guilty of one count of criminal solicitation of a minor, based on the internet chats that occurred from May 4-5, 2006. Appellant was acquitted of the count involving a chat room…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Anthony Odom v. Jerry AdgerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- John Upson v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2024
- Reginald Ware v. Multibank 2009-1 Res-Adc Venture, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- State v. PerrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020