Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Rhoades Drilling Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 25, 1925No. 2449PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRandolph, J.

This suit was filed in the county court of Young county by the Rhoades Drilling Company, a copartnership, against J. B. Eerguson, as defendant.

Plaintiff sues on a verbal contract of hire for the deepening of a certain oil well in Young county by them, in which well J. B. Ferguson had an interest, and alleges that defendant is indebted to them for work done under such contract in the sum of $415.10, being for a balance unpaid, on said contract.

Defendant answered by general demurrer and general denial. The case was tried before a jury which considered special issues, and on their answers…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mhoon v. CainTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. J. H. Milliken & Co. v. Callahan CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Beham v. GhioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  4. Oliver v. ChapmanTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Wells's Adm'x v. FairbankTexas Supreme Court · 1851

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gardner v. WesnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Fort Worth Mut. Benev. Ass'n of Texas v. GoldenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Cox v. BondCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Cleveland State Bank v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API