Legal Opinion

Seastrunk v. Kidd

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 6, 1932No. 1256PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GALLAGHER, O. J.

This appeal is prosecuted by R. L, S.eastrunk and D. A. Platt from a judgment of, the district court of McLennan county, Seventy-Fourth judicial district, setting aside a former judgment theretofore rendered in said court in which Henrietta Dailey, now 1 deceased, recovered frpm the unknown heirs of her deceased husband, Fred Dailey, title and possession of lot 19 in block 2 of the Mittie Renick addition to East Waco, and awarding to appellees Zuma Kidd and Theo- ' dora Bly a recovery against these appellants, • their tenant, F. B. Teague, and Hixie Haines, and various others…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Garza v. KenedyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  2. Stewart v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
  3. Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. KniselSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  4. Heidenheimer v. LoringCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  5. McLean v. StithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. South Texas Development Co. v. MartwickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  2. Holt v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Weston v. Van MeterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  4. Lee v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API