Stewart v. Robbins
Court of Appeals of Texas
10. —Practice on Appeal—Findings of Fact. Error from Tarrant. Tried below before Hon. Irby Dunklin.
1Opinion of the Court
CONNER, Chief Justice.
In 1888 I. N. Stewart, one of the plaintiffs in error, was duly appointed and qualified as guardian of the estate of his minor daughters, Carrie and Grace Stewart. The estate consisted of two parcels of land that Stewart had theretofore purchased and caused to be conveyed to his said daughters. The estate seems to have been regularly administered in the County Court of Tarrant County until June 29, 1893, when a judgment of the District Court was obtained removing the disabilities of Grace Stewart as a minor, Carrie theretofore having obtained her majority. On July 12,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Murchison v. White, 54 Tex. 78 (Tex. 1880)Texas Supreme Court · 1880
- Phoenix Lumber Co. v. Houston Water Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1901
- Eddleman v. McGlatheryTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Brown v. WheelockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
- Fleming v. SeeligsonTexas Supreme Court · 1881
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Swearingen v. SwearingenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Askey v. PowerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Cattlemen's Trust Co. of Ft. Worth v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Kimmell v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Nystel v. GullyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.