Legal Opinion
Robert Y. MORITA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PERMA-NENTE MEDICAL GROUP, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 17, 1976No. 74-2550PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before BARNES, TRASK and SNEÍ3D, Circuit Judges. BARNES, Senior Circuit Judge:
This action was brought by Morita against Southern California Permanente Medical Group [hereinafter referred to as Permanente] under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5. Morita alleged that by denying him promotion, Permanente had discriminated against him because of his race (Oriental). At trial, the district judge, sitting without a jury, granted Permanente’s motion for dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the grounds that, upon the facts and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Ironworkers Local 86Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Claude E. LONG, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Mrintunjoy Sengupta v. Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Palmer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Hershel CLADY, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Jennifer Freyd v. University of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Contreras v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.