Legal Opinion

Contreras v. City of Los Angeles

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 9, 1981No. 78-2060PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Circuit Judge:

Certain former and present city workers (appellants) appeal from the district court’s judgment that they are entitled to no relief under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1981, for having lost their jobs by failing allegedly discriminatory civil service examinations. We affirm.

I

Contreras, E. Gonzalez, Mock, and Zavala (accountants) were employed by the City of Los Angeles (City) as Senior Accountants in the Training and Job Development Division of the Mayor’s office. Maria Gonzalez *1271(Gonzalez) was employed in the same…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Lowe v. City of MonroviaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Tommie Y. MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HUGHES HELICOPTERS, INC., a DIVISION OF SUMMA CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Bouman v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. The Association Of Mexican-American Educators v. State Of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Margaret Spaulding, and James Bush, Intervenors-Appellants v. University of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API