Legal Opinion

Mrintunjoy Sengupta v. Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 18, 1986No. 85-4183PublishedCited by 124 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNEED, Circuit Judge:

Mrintunjoy Sengupta, an East Indian whose skin pigment is black, was employed as a senior engineer by the Morrison-Knudsen Co. (M-K). In early 1982, M-K experienced economic difficulties that necessitated significant reductions in its work force. Sengupta was discharged. Thereafter he brought suit, claiming that his discharge violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; 42 U.S.C. § 1981; the Idaho Human Rights Act; and Idaho contract law. The district court granted summary judgment for M-K on all of Sengupta’s claims. We affirm.

I

FACTS AND…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by124 opinions

  1. John D. Chapman v. Ai TransportCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  2. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Theodore L. Leblanc v. Great American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  5. William Earl Warren III v. City of Carlsbad Brian Watson James Thompson Frank Mannen Raymond Patchett Stewart Gary Ann JansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API