Legal Opinion

Schreiner v. New York & New Jersey Telephone Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 4, 1912PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Cn error to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cubiam.

The judgment in tills case is affirmed, for the reason stated in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court, which was as follows:

“While passing along North Canal street, in Newark, the plaintiff was injured by the falling of a wooden gate which defendant maintained on its premises* and which hung on a trolley.
“The jury found for the plaintiff. Pie was an epileptic, and an operation had been performed on his head some four years prior to the accident.
“It is insisted, as a first assignment of error, that the court improperly admitted testimony of an expert witness concerning the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tully v. Gibbs & Hill, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  2. Miko v. FeldmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  3. Maulsbury v. ShureSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  4. State v. Lackawanna RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API